Laminated cloth

ABSTRACT

Provided is a laminated body, said laminated body being a laminated cloth the back surface of which has excellent properties against tangling and abrasion and good separability from the skin and which has a good texture and a favorable appearance and is comfortable to wear when made into clothing. The laminated cloth includes a front surface layer, a middle layer and a back surface layer, said layers being stacked one on another, wherein: the front surface layer comprises one member selected from the group consisting of a woven fabric, a knitted fabric and a non-woven fabric; the middle layer comprises a resin film or a non-woven fabric; and the back surface layer comprises a circular knitted fabric in which filament yarn of 60 dtex or less is used at least in part thereof and which is configured from knitting stitches and tack stitches, 9 to 72 said tack stitches being disposed per area of 12 wales×12 courses.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a laminated cloth used for variousgarments typified by rainwear, mountain wear, sportswear, outdoorworkwear, and the like.

BACKGROUND ART

Conventionally, in applications for garments which are required to havewindbreaking ability, water resistance/water vapor permeability, or thelike, laminated cloths have been provided which achieve the requiredperformances by stacking a resin film on one surface of a fabric (frontfabric), such as a woven fabric, a knitted fabric, or a non-wovenfabric, by means of coating, lamination, or the like.

However, these laminated cloths have such problems that the resin filmis easily peeled or damaged and hence the performances deteriorate, andthat direct contact of the resin film with the skin of a wearer gives asticky feel.

In this respect, laminated cloths have been proposed in which a fabricis stacked also on a surface opposite from the surface of the resin filmon which the front fabric is stacked to prevent direct contact of theresin film with the skin and the like. Thus, the resin film is preventedfrom being peeled, being damaged, and giving a sticky feel.

For example, a laminated cloth has been disclosed in which awater-repellent nylon taffeta, a porous polytetrafluoroethylene filmtreated with a hydrophilic polyurethane resin, and a nylon tricot arestacked on each other (Patent Document 1).

A fabric used for a back surface (skin-side surface) of the laminatedcloth as described in Patent Document 1 is required to be thin and lightto avoid increase in thickness and mass per unit area of the entirelaminated cloth, to give no sticky feel upon contact with the skin, andto reduce the sticky feel of the resin film present inside the fabric.For this reason, a tricot knitted fabric in which a rugged structure isformed on a surface has been conventionally used.

However, when a tricot knitted fabric is used for the back surface,there arises such a problem that the rugged structure of the tricotknitted fabric is likely to be tangled with a button, hooks of ahook-and-loop fastener (for example, a hook-and-loop fastenermanufactured by KURARAY FASTENING CO., LTD under the trade name of “NEWECOMAGIC” (registered trademark)), and the like, so that the tricotknitted fabric degrades because of abrasion.

Meanwhile, a water vapor permeable/water resistant laminated cloth hasbeen proposed in which a water vapor permeable/water resistant layer isstacked on one surface of a base cloth, and further a cloth obtained byusing textured yarn having a total fineness of 16 dtex or less isstacked on the water vapor permeable/water resistant layer (PatentDocument 2).

However, the water vapor permeable/water resistant laminated cloth asdescribed in Patent Document 2 is intended exclusively to be excellentin lightness in weight. When the cloth is a woven fabric, the cloth hasa problem of the texture, while when the cloth is a knitted fabric, thecloth has problems associated with physical properties, such asdegradation due to tangling or abrasion.

For the above-described reasons, no laminated cloth has been achievedyet in which the back surface is excellent in terms of all the physicalproperties associated with resistance to tangling and abrasion,separability from the skin, texture, and the like under the currentsituation.

PRIOR ART DOCUMENT Patent Document

-   Patent Document 1: Japanese patent application Kokai publication No.    Sho 55-7483-   Patent Document 2: Japanese patent application Kokai publication No.    2010-201811

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION Problem to be Solved by the Invention

In view of the above-described points, an object of the presentinvention is to provide, in the field of a laminated cloth havingapplications for garments which are required to have windbreakingability, water resistance/water vapor permeability, or the like, andother applications, a laminate which solves the problems of the physicalproperties associated with resistance to tangling and abrasion, theseparability from the skin, and the texture of the back surface of thelaminate, and which is comfortably to wear when made into a garment.

Means for Solving the Problem

To solve the problems, a laminated cloth of the present invention hasthe following configuration (1).

(1) A laminated cloth comprising a front surface layer, a middle layer,and a back surface layer stacked on each other, wherein

one selected from the group consisting of a woven fabric, a knittedfabric, and a non-woven fabric is used for the front surface layer,

a resin film or a non-woven fabric is used for the middle layer,

a circular knitted fabric having knit stitches and tuck stitches is usedfor the back surface layer,

filament yarn of 60 dtex or less is used in at least part of thecircular knitted fabric, and

the number of the tuck stitches of the circular knitted fabric is 9 to72 per area of 12 wales×12 courses.

In addition, the laminated cloth of the present invention furtherpreferably has any one of the following configurations (2) to (14).

(2) The laminated cloth according to (1), wherein

the number of the knit stitches of the circular knitted fabric is 1,000or more and 20,000 or less per 6.45 cm².

(3) The laminated cloth according to (1), wherein

the number of the knit stitches of the circular knitted fabric is 1,000or more and 15,000 or less per 6.45 cm².

(4) The laminated cloth according to (1), wherein

the number of the knit stitches of the circular knitted fabric is 2,000or more and 10,000 or less per 6.45 cm².

(5) The laminated cloth according to (1), wherein

the number of the knit stitches of the circular knitted fabric is 2,500or more and 9,000 or less per 6.45 cm².

(6) The laminated cloth according to (1), wherein

the number of the knit stitches of the circular knitted fabric is 3,000or more and 8,000 or less per 6.45 cm².

(7) The laminated cloth according to any one of (1) to (6), wherein

the circular knitted fabric is a single circular knitted fabric.

(8) The laminated cloth according to any one of (1) to (7), wherein

the filament yarn has a fineness of 36 dtex or less.

(9) The laminated cloth according to any one of (1) to (8), wherein

two or more types of filament yarn are used as the filament yarn.

(10) The laminated cloth according to any one of (1) to (9), wherein

two or more types of filament yarn having different finenesses are usedas the filament yarn.

(11) The laminated cloth according to any one of (1) to (10), wherein

the middle layer is obtained by using a resin film or a non-woven fabrichaving an air permeability of 50 cc/cm²·sec or less, the airpermeability being measured by the method A (Frazier-type) of JapaneseIndustrial Standard (JIS)-L-1096.

(12) The laminated cloth according to any one of (1) to (11), wherein

the middle layer is obtained by using a resin film or a non-woven fabrichaving a degree of waterproof property (water resistance) of 100 cm ormore and a water vapor permeability of 50 g/m²·h or more, the degree ofwaterproof property being measured by the method A of JapaneseIndustrial Standard (JIS) L 1092, the water vapor permeability beingmeasured by the method B-2 of JIS L 1099.

(13) The laminated cloth according to any one of (1) to (12), wherein

the circular knitted fabric has a mass per unit area of 50 g/m² or less.

(14) The laminated cloth according to any one of (1) to (13), wherein

the circular knitted fabric has a cover factor (CF) of 200 to 800.

Effects of the Invention

In the field of a laminated cloth having applications for garments whichare required to have windbreaking ability, water resistance/water vaporpermeability, or the like, and other applications, the present inventioncan achieve a cloth having the following characteristics. Specifically,since a back cloth having a rugged structure is used, the back surface(skin side surface) has good separability from the skin. Moreover, sincethe rugged structure is fine, the back surface has good physicalproperties such as wear resistance and property of preventing the backsurface from being tangled by a hook-and-loop fastener, a button, or thelike. In addition, the cloth has good texture.

Since the laminated cloth of the present invention has theabove-described characteristics, a laminated cloth suitable for variousgarments such as rainwear, mountain wear, sportswear, and outdoorworkwear is provided.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing an example of a single circularknitted fabric usable for a laminated cloth of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing a state where the example of thesingle circular knitted fabric usable for the laminated cloth of thepresent invention is stretched.

FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a plain-stitch single circular knittedfabric, which cannot constitute a back surface layer of the laminatedcloth of the present invention.

FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram illustrating a state where theplain-stitch single circular knitted fabric shown in FIG. 3 is stretchedin the width direction.

FIG. 5 is a schematic side view showing a model of an example of astructure of the laminated cloth of the present invention.

FIG. 6 is a structural diagram showing a single circular knitted fabricused in an example of the laminated cloth of the present invention.

FIG. 7 is a structural diagram showing a single circular knitted fabricused in another example of the laminated cloth of the present invention.

FIG. 8 is a structural diagram showing a single circular knitted fabricused in a still another example of the laminated cloth of the presentinvention.

FIG. 9 is a structural diagram showing a single circular knitted fabricused for a laminated cloth of Comparative Example.

MODES FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION

Hereinafter, a laminated cloth of the present invention is describedwith reference to the drawings.

The laminated cloth of the present invention includes a front surfacelayer, a middle layer, and a back surface layer stacked on each other,wherein one selected from the group consisting of a woven fabric, aknitted fabric, and a non-woven fabric is used for the front surfacelayer, a resin film or a non-woven fabric is used for the middle layer,a circular knitted fabric having knit stitches and tuck stitches is usedfor the back surface layer, filament yarn of 60 dtex or less is used inat least part of the circular knitted fabric, and the number of the tuckstitches of the circular knitted fabric is 9 to 72 per area of 12wales×12 courses. The components are described one by one below.

A conventional circular knitted fabric is constituted of stitches.Hence, the circular knitted fabric has a soft texture, because theinterlocking of constituent yarn allows loose movement. However, thecircular knitted fabric has a drawback of poor physical propertiesassociated with resistance to tangling. The physical propertiesassociated with resistance to tangling are improved by increasing theknitting density of the fabric. However, excessive increase in knittingdensity results in a high mass per unit area of the fabric, and hencemakes the fabric unsuitable for a back cloth. In this respect, plainstitch fabrics, which are the most lightweight among circular knittedfabrics, have been often used. However, the plain stitch fabrics havesuch problems that the weight reduction increases the occurrence of arun in a case where the fabric is stretched or other cases, and thismakes the fabrics difficult to handle, and that when a wearer perspires,the separability from the skin is poor because of the flat surface.

In this respect, it is important that the circular knitted fabric be acircular knitted fabric having knit stitches and tuck stitches. A tuckstitch is a stitch formed by a strand in a state of not actually formingany stitch but being hooked on a knit stitch, as indicated by A in FIG.1 .

In contrast, a plain stitch fabric is a knitted fabric having uniformstitches as shown in FIG. 3 . When the plain stitch fabric is stretchedin the width direction as shown in FIG. 4 , a force is applied uniformlyto each stitch. After a stitch e is broken, stitches f, g, and h arealso broken continuously to cause a run. On the other hand, in the caseof a structure including tuck stitches, the knitted fabric has stitcheshaving non-uniform sizes as shown in FIG. 1 . For this reason, thefabric is such that even if a stitch a is broken upon stretching in thewidth direction as shown in FIG. 2 , a force is not applied uniformly tothe stitches b, c, and d, so that the stitches are less likely to bebroken, and the fabric becomes resistant to a run. Since the fabric isresistant to a run, the fabric is easy to handle in dyeing process andlamination process.

Moreover, in the knitted fabric including tuck stitches, the sizes ofthe knit stitches are non-uniform. Hence, in the fabric as shown in FIG.1 , the knit stitch B has a raised structure, while the knit stitches Cand D have recessed structures. Thus, the fabric as a whole has a ruggedstructure. For this reason, the contact area between the skin and theknitted fabric is reduced, and this leads to a good separability fromthe skin.

In addition, since a circular knitted fabric is constituted of stitches,the circular knitted fabric has spaces. When the spaces are wide, theportions become more see-thru, while when the spaces are narrow, theportions become less see-thru. If the variations of spaces arecontinuously occurs, a drawback such as a longitudinal line (a line inthe longitudinal direction) or a lateral line (a line in the widthdirection) is caused. In a knitted fabric having uniform stitches as ina plain stitch fabric, this drawback is noticeable even when thedifference among the spaces is slight. On the other hand, in a knittedfabric including tuck stitches, the stitches are non-uniform, althoughhaving certain regularity. Moreover, the threads of the tuck stitchesare present among the knit stitches. Hence, the spaces are non-uniform,and this drawback is less noticeable, if the drawback is caused byslight difference among the spaces. In addition, this drawback becomesmore noticeable, as the density increases.

Moreover, it is important that the number of the tuck stitches be in arange from 9 to 72 per area of 12 wales×12 courses. As long as thenumber of the tuck stitches is within the above-described range, thefabric may have any structure, but is preferably a single circularknitted fabric considering the ease of weight reduction.

The number of courses here does not refer to the number of the knitstitches in the longitudinal direction, which is ordinarily employed,but refers to the number of strands of yarn fed. One feeder for aknitted fabric structure is counted as one course. In other words, the“area of 12 wales×12 courses” means an area defined by 12 knit stitchesin the width direction (wales) and 12 strands of yarn fed in thelongitudinal direction (courses). For example, as shown in a knittingmethod in FIG. 6 , the number of tuck stitches A per area of 12 wales×12courses is 36 in a case of a single circular knitted fabric in which asingle perfect knitting structure is formed by using four feeders F1 toF4, and using four strands of yarn, namely strands i, j, k, and l. Inother words, in the case of this structure, 12 tuck stitches are presentin a single perfect knitting structure (in which the number of strandsof yarn fed is four) per 12 wales. The value is converted to a value for12 courses as follows: 12 tuck stitches×12 courses/4 courses=36stitches. Note, however, that, for a double circular knitted fabric, anaverage value of the number of tuck stitches per area of 12 wales×12courses on a cylinder surface and the number of tuck stitches per areaof 12 wales×12 courses on a dial surface is employed as the number oftuck stitches per area of 12 wales×12 courses.

The following problems arise in association with the number of tuckstitches per area of 12 wales×12 courses. Specifically, when the numberof tuck stitches is less than nine, the tuck stitches are so few thatthe effect on the separability from the skin and the effect ofpreventing a run are reduced. Meanwhile, when the number of tuckstitches exceeds 72, the tuck stitches are so many that the increasedamount of the yarn used leads to increase in mass per unit area, andmakes productivity poor. The number of the tuck stitches is preferablyin a range from 18 to 54, and more preferably in a range from 24 to 48.

Moreover, when tuck stitches are continuously arranged in the samewales, the rugged structure can be more noticeable. A tuck stitch has astructure of being hooked on a knit stitch. Here, when tuck stitches arecontinuously provided in a single wale, the strands of the yarn of thetuck stitches are stacked on each other at the same knit stitch. Hence,the raised structure of the stacked portion becomes noticeable. However,if the raised structure becomes excessively noticeable, physicalproperties associated with resistance to tangling become poor. Hence,the number of tuck stitches continuously arranged in a single wale ispreferably 6 or less and more preferably 5 or less.

In addition, characteristics of the circular knitted fabric vary alsodepending on the number of knit stitches per 6.45 cm². The number of theknit stitches per 6.45 cm² is a value obtained by multiplying the numberof wales per 2.54 cm by the number of courses per 2.54 cm. When thenumber of the knit stitches is large, the resultant fabric becomes densewith narrow spaces between stitches. Meanwhile, when the number of theknit stitches is small, the resultant fabric becomes coarse with widespaces between stitches. Note, however, that, for a double circularknitted fabric, the total value of the number of knit stitches per 6.45cm² on the cylinder surface and the number of knit stitches per 6.45 cm²on the dial surface are employed as the number of knit stitches per 6.45cm².

As described above, the circular knitted fabric used in the presentinvention includes tuck stitches, and hence has a rugged structure.Here, if fine recessed and raised structures are densely provided, theseparability from the skin, the texture, and the physical propertiesassociated with resistance to tangling can be further improved. However,if the number of knit stitches increases excessively, the mass per unitarea is so large that influences on the entire laminated clothincreases. From such viewpoints, the number of knit stitches per 6.45cm² is preferably in a range from 1,000 or more to 20,000 or less. Thenumber of knit stitches per 6.45 cm² is more preferably in a range from1,000 or more to 15,000 or less, still more preferably in a range from2,000 or more to 10,000 or less, further preferably in a range from2,500 or more to 9,000 or less, and most preferably in a range from3,000 or more to 8,000 or less.

In the circular knitted fabric, filament yarn of 60 dtex or less ispreferably used in at least part of the circular knitted fabric. Afilament yarn of 48 dtex or less is more preferable, a filament yarn of36 dtex or less is further preferable, and a filament yarn of 24 dtex orless is the most preferable. The ratio of the filament yarn to fibersconstituting the fabric is most preferably 100% by mass, because ahigher ratio leads to a smaller mass. In addition, the ratio ispreferably at least 25% by mass or more, and more preferably 50% by massor more.

The number of filaments in the filament yarn is preferably in a rangefrom 1 to 72, and more preferably in a range from 3 to 36. A largernumber of filaments makes it possible to obtain a laminated cloth with asofter texture. However, if the number of filaments is too much, thesingle fiber fineness excessively decreases, so that physical propertiesassociated with resistance to tangling and abrasion become poor.

The filament yarn is preferably made of a synthetic fiber from theviewpoint of strength, durability, texturing processability, and costs.In particular, a polyester fiber, a polyamide fiber, or a polypropylenefiber is preferable. However, the yarn is not limited to those ofsynthetic fibers, as long as the yarn is a filament yarn. For example,it is possible to use a regenerated fiber such as rayon or cuprammoniumrayon or a semi-synthetic fiber such as acetate or triacetate to enhancemoisture-absorption characteristics and color developmentcharacteristics. Furthermore, it is possible to use a biodegradabilityfiber, a side-by-side fiber, an electrically conductive fiber, afluorine-containing fiber, or the like.

As the filament yarn, untreated yarn which is straight yarn notsubjected to any special texturing process after a spinning process,false-twist textured yarn subjected to a texturing process, airintermingled filament yarn, air interlaced yarn, twisted yarn, or thelike can be used. To make the back cloth less likely to be tangled by ahook-and-loop fastener or the like, yarn having good filament integrityis preferably used. In particular, untextured yarn, which is straightyarn subjected to slight air interlacing to provide the integrity, ispreferable considering the physical properties associated withresistance to tangling and abrasion, as well as texture.

In addition, by using two or more different types of fibers for thefilament yarn, the rugged structure can be adjusted, and the appearanceand texture can be modified. The difference in type of the fibers may bedifference in fineness, raw material, texturing process, single fiberfineness, cross-sectional shape, or the like. For example, by usingfibers having different finenesses, the rugged structure can beadjusted. In the structure of FIG. 6 , the fiber used for F2 and F4 hasgreat influence on the raised portions. Hence, when a coarse fiber isused for F2 and F4, and a fine fiber is used for F1 and F3, a fabric canbe obtained which has a light weight and in which a more noticeablerugged structure is formed. In addition, when the fiber used for F2 andF4 is finer than the fiber used for F1 and F3, a fabric can be obtainedin which the rugged structure is formed relatively moderately.

The following are other examples of the use of different types offibers. Specifically, a pattern can be provided by using a polyamidefiber and a polyester fiber and dyeing them in different colors; apattern based on difference in luster can be provided by using polyamidefibers having different titanium oxide contents; and a soft texture canbe obtained, while reducing decrease in strength, by using yarn having afine single fiber fineness only as the yarn forming the raised portions.

After knitted by fitting a knitting machine and knitting conditions todesired conditions and the like, the circular knitted fabric can befinished to have a desired total number of knit stitches by finaladjustment of the number of wales and the number of courses also in adyeing process.

The knitting machine is not particularly limited, as long as theknitting machine is a circular knitting machine. Here, to obtain adesired number of the knit stitches, a single circular knitting machinewith a gauge of 28 or more is preferably used for a single circularknitted fabric. A single circular knitting machine with a gauge of 36 ormore is preferably used to obtain a further increased number of knitstitches. For a double circular knitted fabric, a double circularknitting machine with a gauge of 22 or more is preferably used, and adouble circular knitted fabric with a gauge of 28 or more is morepreferable.

As for a method for the dyeing process, the process can be carried outby a conventionally known dyeing method.

The fabric used for the front surface layer of the laminated cloth ofthe present invention is any one of a woven fabric, a knitted fabric,and a non-woven fabric. The structure is not particularly limited, andtypes of the woven fabric which can be used include a plain weavefabric, a twill weave fabric, a satin weave fabric, a basket weavefabric, a steep twill weave fabric, a weft backed weave fabric, a warpbacked weave fabric, or the like. Types of the knitted fabric which canbe used include those obtained by plain stitch, 1×1 plain stitch, mossstitch, rib stitch, interlock stitch (smooth stitch), pearl stitch,ponte roma stitch, milano rib stitch, blister stitch, and the like,which are weft knitted fabrics, as well as those obtained by singledenbigh stitch, single cord stitch, single atlas stitch, half tricotstitch, double denbigh stitch, satin stitch, and the like, which arewarp knitted fabrics. Types of the non-woven fabric which can be usedinclude a short fiber non-woven fabric, a filament fiber non-wovenfabric, a flash-spun non-woven fabric, a melt-blown non-woven fabric,and the like. In addition, a material constituting the fabric used forthe front surface layer can be selected, as appropriate, from naturalfibers such as cotton and hemp and synthetic fibers such as polyesterfibers and polyamide fibers depending on the application of thelaminated cloth. For example, when the laminated cloth of the presentinvention is used for mountain wear for which strength, durability,light weight, and the like are considered to be important, it ispreferable to use a woven fabric constituted of a polyester fiber, apolyamide fiber, or the like. When the laminated cloth of the presentinvention is used for sportswear for which stretchability, light weight,and the like are considered to be important, it is preferable to use aknitted fabric constituted of a polyester fiber, a polyamide fiber, orthe like. In addition, if necessary, the fabric used for the frontsurface layer can be subjected to a water-repellent treatment process,an anti-static treatment process, or the like.

In addition, as the fabric used for the front surface layer, “a circularknitted fabric having knit stitches and tuck stitches, in which filamentyarn of 60 dtex or less is used in at least part of the fabric, and thenumber of the tuck stitches is 9 to 72 per area of 12 wales×12 courses”may be used as in the case of the fabric used for the above-describedback surface. In such a case, specifications of the fabric may becompletely the same as those of the circular knitted fabric used for theback surface, or a fabric may be used which falls within theabove-described ranges of the fineness of the filament yarn and numberof tuck stitches, but which has specific points different from those ofthe back surface layer.

The resin film or the non-woven fabric used for the middle layer of thelaminated cloth of the present invention is not particularly limited, aslong as the resin film or the non-woven fabric has a flexibilitysufficient for garment applications. As the resin film, it is possibleto use, for example, a film of a polyurethane resin, a polyester resinsuch as polyethylene terephthalate or polybutylene terephthalate, anacrylic resin, a polyolefin resin such as polyethylene or a polyolefin,a polyamide resin, a vinyl chloride resin, a synthetic rubber, a naturalrubber, a fluorine-containing resin, or the like. Note that the “resinfilm” herein is a concept including ordinary non-air permeable resinthin films, as well as resin thin films formed to have a porousstructure by which a moderate air permeability or water vaporpermeability is provided as described later, and the like. For example,it is possible to use a film of a porous polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)known by the brand name of “Gore-Tex” (registered trademark), or thelike.

As the non-woven fabric, it is possible to use, as appropriate, a shortfiber non-woven fabric, a filament fiber non-woven fabric, a flash-spunnon-woven fabric, a melt-blown non-woven fabric, an electrospunnon-woven fabric, or the like of polyester, polypropylene, polyethylene,polyvinyl alcohol, polyamide, acrylonitrile, acetate, cellulose,polyurethane or the like. In addition, a stack of multiple sheetsthereof may be used.

Note that, in the present invention, the “middle layer” means, so tospeak, an “intermediate layer” positioned between the front surfacelayer and the back surface layer. The middle layer (intermediate layer)may be formed of a single layer, but is not limited to such a case.Multiple layers of the same type or multiple layers of different typesas a whole may form the middle layer (intermediate layer).

The thickness of the middle layer is preferably 1 μm or more and 300 μmor less, and more preferably 5 μm or more and 100 μm or less. Athickness of the middle layer of less than 1 μm is not preferable,because problems associated with handleability arise during production.Meanwhile, when the thickness of the middle layer exceeds 300 μm, theflexibility of the plastic film tends to be so impaired that the filmbecomes unsuitable for garments. The thickness of the middle layer ismeasured based on a thickness measured with a dial thickness gauge(measured by using a SM-1201 1/1000-mm dial thickness gauge manufacturedby TECLOCK corporation without applying any load except the load of thespring of the main body).

On the basis of further examination conducted by the present inventors,it is preferable to use, as the middle layer, a film or a non-wovenfabric having windbreaking ability or water resistance/water vaporpermeability.

When a windbreaking film or a windbreaking non-woven fabric is used asthe middle layer, windbreaking ability can be provided to the laminatedcloth obtained by the present invention. Meanwhile, when a waterresistant/water vapor permeable film or a water resistant/water vaporpermeable non-woven fabric is used, water resistance/water vaporpermeability can be provided to the laminated cloth obtained by thepresent invention. Note that a film or a non-woven fabric having waterresistance/water vapor permeability also has windbreaking ability, ingeneral.

Specifically, for applications where windbreaking ability are especiallyrequired, as in a windbreaker or the like, it is preferable to use, forthe middle layer, a resin film or a non-woven fabric having an airpermeability or 50 cc/cm² sec or less. Here, the air permeability ismeasured by the method A (Frazier-type) of Japanese Industrial Standard(JIS) L 1096. The air permeability is more preferably 10 cc/cm²·sec orless, and further preferably 0.1 cc/cm²·sec or less. A lower limit of apreferred range is generally 0.00 to 0.02 cc/cm²·sec.

On the other hand, for applications where water resistance is especiallyrequired, as in the case of a rain ware or the like, it is preferable touse, for the middle layer, a resin film or a non-woven fabric having adegree of waterproof property (water resistance) of 100 cm or more.Here, the degree of waterproof property (water resistance) is determinedby the method A of Japanese Industrial Standard (JIS) L 1092. The degreeof waterproof property is more preferably 200 cm or more. An upper limitof a preferred range is 1000 to 5000 cm, in general.

Moreover, to impart water resistance/water vapor permeability to anexcellent rain ware having such characteristics, a water vaporpermeability is preferably 50 g/m²·h or more. Here, the water vaporpermeability is measured by the method B-2 of Japanese IndustrialStandard (JIS) L 1099. The water resistance/water vapor permeabilitymeans that both “water resistance” for blocking water and “water vaporpermeability” for allowing water vapor permeation are provided. Bysetting the “degree of waterproof property” and the “water vaporpermeability” within the above-described ranges, a desired waterresistance/water vapor permeation performance can be provided. Forexample, when the laminated cloth of the present invention is processedinto a garment and used, water vapor in sweat discharged from the bodyof the wearer is released to the outside through the laminated cloth, sothat stuffy feel can be prevented during wearing. The water vaporpermeability is more preferably 100 g/m²·h or more. An upper limit valueof the water vapor permeability is generally 2000 to 5000 g/m²·h,because an excessively high water vapor permeability leads to increasein the amount of water permeated, so that the water resistance functionis impaired, in general.

As a resin film satisfying the water resistance/water vaporpermeability, it is possible to use a hydrophilic resin film of apolyurethane resin, a polyester resin, a silicone resin, a polyvinylalcohol resin, or the like, or a porous film (hereinafter simplyreferred to as “hydrophobic porous film” in some cases) made of ahydrophobic resin such as a polyester resin, a polyolefin resinincluding polyethylene, polypropylene, and the like, afluorine-containing resin, a polyurethane resin subjected to awater-repellent treatment, or the like. Here, the “hydrophobic resin”means a resin having a contact angle of a water droplet of 60 degrees orhigher (measuring temperature: 25° C.), and more preferably 80 degreesor higher. The contact angle is a contact angle of a water dropletplaced on a surface of a smooth and flat plate formed by using theresin.

In the hydrophobic porous film, a porous structure having inner pores(continuous pores) retains the water vapor permeability, while thehydrophobic resin constituting a film base material inhibits water fromentering the pores. Thus, the film as a whole exhibits water resistance.Of these, a porous film made of a fluorine-containing resin ispreferable as the water resistant/water vapor permeable film, and theabove-described porous polytetrafluoroethylene film (hereinafter,referred to as “porous PTFE film” in some cases) is more preferable. Inparticular, a porous PTFE film is preferable, because the hydrophobicity(water repellency) of polytetrafluoroethylene, which is the resincomponent constituting the film base material, is high, so that anexcellent water resistance and an excellent water vapor permeability canbe both achieved.

As the water resistant/water vapor permeable non-woven fabric, it ispossible to use a non-woven fabric of polyester, polypropylene,polyethylene, polyvinyl alcohol, polyamide, polyurethane, or the like.In particular, the fiber constituting the non-woven fabric is preferablyan ultrafine fiber having a diameter of 1 μm or less. The non-wovenfabric can be obtained by arranging fibers in a sheet-like shape by anelectrospinning method, a melt-blowing method, a flash spinning method,a combined spinning method, or the like. In particular, the melt-blowingmethod or the electrospinning method is preferable, because theproduction of the ultrafine fiber can be easily controlled, and anon-woven fabric having desired characteristics can be easily obtained.

In the electrospinning method, a solution method or a melt method isused. The non-woven fabric can be formed by appropriately selecting oneof the solution method and the melt method according to the componentforming the fiber. For example, the non-woven fabric can be obtained byusing an ultrafine fiber as follows. Specifically, a non-woven fabric ofpolyurethane can be obtained by a solution method usingdimethylformamide as a solvent. A non-woven fabric of polyvinyl alcoholcan be obtained by a solution method using water as a solvent. Anon-woven fabric of a thermoplastic resin such as a polyester, apolyamide, or a thermoplastic polyurethane can be obtained by a meltmethod. Of these, polyurethane is preferably used because of thestretchability.

In addition, to improve the windbreaking ability or the waterresistance/water vapor permeability, multiple sheets of any ones ofthese resin films and these non-woven fabrics may be stacked, and usedas the middle layer.

In the present invention, the resin film or the non-woven fabricconstituting the middle layer, the top layer which is one selected froma woven fabric, a knitted fabric, and a non-woven fabric, and the backcloth, which is the circular knitted fabric, can be stacked on eachother by using a production technique such as a direct coating method ona cloth, or a lamination method in which a coating film is formed, andthen boded onto a cloth with an adhesive agent or the like.

The direct coating method means that a resin is directly applied onto asurface of a cloth in a shape of a uniform thin film, and converted to acoating film. The direct coating method includes a wet method in whichthe conversion to the coating film is carried out by passing throughwater, and a dry method in which the conversion to the coating film iscarried out by drying. General methods for applying the resin includeknife-over-roll coating, direct roll coating, reverse roll coating,gravure coating, and the like. The resin may be applied to have adesired film thickness by using any of these coating methods.

In the lamination method, an adhesive agent is applied onto a resin filmor a non-woven fabric prepared in advance, and then a cloth is stackedthereon. General methods for applying the adhesive agent includeknife-over-roll coating, direct roll coating, reverse roll coating,gravure coating, and the like. The adhesive agent may be applied toachieve a desired coating ratio by using any of these coating methods.

As the adhesive agent, it is possible to use a thermoplastic resinadhesive agent, as well as a curable-resin adhesive agent which reactsand is cured by heat or light, or the like. For example, a polyesterresin, a polyamide resin, a polyurethane resin, a silicone resin, anacrylic resin, a polyvinyl chloride resin, a polyolefin resin, or thelike can be used. Particularly when the laminated cloth of the presentinvention is used for a water resistant/water vapor permeable garment,an adhesive agent having a high water vapor permeability is preferable.

The coating ratio by the adhesive agent is not particularly limited. Ahigher coating ratio leads to a higher peel strength. For example, whenthe laminated cloth of the present invention is used for a waterresistant/water vapor permeable garment, the entire surfaces may bebonded to each other with a coating ratio of 100%, if the adhesive agenthas a high water vapor permeability. However, the coating ratio ispreferably 20 to 80%, in general, considering the compatibility betweenthe degree of waterproof property and the water vapor permeability. Whenthe entire surfaces are bonded to each other with a coating ratio of100%, a knife coater or the like is used. When the coating ratio iscontrolled to 20 to 80%, the adhesive agent can be applied by using agravure coater or the like. The gravure coater is a method in which, forexample, a roll having dot-shaped recessed portions carved on a surfacethereof is used, and the adhesive agent is introduced into the recessedportions and transferred to the resin film for the processing. Thecoating ratio can be adjusted by adjusting the areas and depths of therecessed portions and the distance between the recessed portions.

By using the above-described method, one selected from the groupconsisting of a woven fabric, a knitted fabric, and a non-woven fabricas the front surface layer, a resin film or a non-woven fabric as themiddle layer, and a circular knitted fabric having knit stitches andtuck stitches as the back surface layer, in which filament yarn of 60dtex or less is used in at least part of the circular knitted fabric,and the number of the tuck stitches is 9 to 72 per area of 12 wales×12courses, are stacked on each other as shown in FIG. 5 . Thus, thelaminated cloth of the present invention can be obtained.

In addition, when the circular knitted fabric is a single circularknitted fabric, either a needle loop surface or a sinker loop surfacecan be used as the use-surface (the surface appearing on the surfaceafter stacking) and may be selected as appropriate depending on apurpose.

The circular knitted fabric usable for the laminated cloth of thepresent invention has a mass per unit area of preferably 50 g/m² orless, more preferably 45 g/m² or less, further preferably 40 g/m² orless, and most preferably 35 g/m² or less. A mass per unit areaexceeding 50 g/m² is not preferable, because the excessively heavy massresults in increased influence on the entire laminated cloth, and tendsto impair the characteristics of the present invention, namely, lightweight and high-performance characteristics. A lower limit is preferably3 g/m² or higher, more preferably 5 g/m² or higher, and furtherpreferably 7 g/m² or higher.

The circular knitted fabric usable for the laminated cloth of thepresent invention preferably has a cover factor (CF) in a range from 200to 800, and more preferably in a range from 250 to 750. The cover factorcan be calculated by the following formula.CF={√T×W}+{√T×C}

CF: cover factor

T: fineness (dtex) of constituent yarn

W: the number of wales per 2.54 cm

C: the number of courses per 2.54 cm

Note that, for a double circular knitted fabric, the cover factor valueon one surface and the cover factor value on the other surface arecalculated, and the sum of these values is employed as the cover factor.

When the cover factor is less than 200, the density of the knittedfabric becomes so low that physical properties associated withresistance to tangling and abrasion and smoothness are impaired. Whenthe cover factor exceeds 800, the density of the knitted fabric becomesso high that the high mass per unit area leads to increased influence onthe entire laminated cloth, and it tends to be difficult to obtain adesired laminated cloth having a light weight and high performance.

EXAMPLES

Further detailed description is made below based on Examples. However,the present invention is not limited to these Examples. Note thatphysical properties were measured by the following methods in Examples.

(1) Number of Knit Stitches

For a single circular knitted fabric, first, the number of wales, whichwas the number of stitches per 2.54 cm in the width direction of theknitted fabric, and the number of wales, which was the number ofstitches per 2.54 cm in the longitudinal direction of the knittedfabric, were measured at three sites. Then, an average value of each ofthe numbers is calculated, and was rounded off to an integer. In themeasurement, the length per 100 stitches was measured, and these valueswere converted to the number of stitches per 2.54 cm. Note that, whenthe number of courses of a structure in which wales having differentnumbers of stitches were present as shown in FIG. 8 or 9 was measured,the number of stitches was measured for each of the wales, and then theaverage value of these numbers of courses is calculated. A valuecalculated by multiplying the calculated number of wales by thecalculated number of courses was employed as the number of the knitstitches per 6.45 cm².

For a double circular knitted fabric, the number of the knit stitcheswas determined as described in Description.

(2) Number of Tuck Stitches

For a single circular knitted fabric, the number of tuck stitches in onecomplete knitting cycle per 12 wales was converted to a value per 12courses according to the following formula, and rounded off to onedecimal place. This value was employed as the number of tuck stitchesper area of 12 wales×12 courses.AT=ST×12/F

AT: The number of tuck stitches per area of 12 wales×12 courses

ST: The number of tuck stitches in one complete knitting cycle per 12wales

F: The number of strands of yarn fed (the number of feeders) in onecomplete knitting cycle

For a double circular knitted fabric, the number of tuck stitches wasdetermined as described in Description.

(3) Air Permeability

The air permeability (cc/cm² sec) of a test piece was measured based onthe method A (Frazier-type) of Japanese Industrial Standard (JIS) L1096. The measurement was conducted five times, and the average valuewas calculated, and rounded off to one decimal place.

(4) Degree of Waterproof Property

The degree of waterproof property (cm) of a test piece was measuredbased on the method A of Japanese Industrial Standard (JIS) L 1092(low-water pressure method). Here, the rate of water level rise was 600mm/min±30 mm/min.

(5) Water Vapor Permeability

The water vapor permeability (g/m²·h) was measured based on the methodB-2 of Japanese Industrial Standard (JIS) L 1099 (alternative potassiumacetate method).

(6) Mass Per Unit Area

The mass per unit area (g/m²) of a test piece was measured based onJapanese Industrial Standard (JIS) L 1096.

(7) Durability Against Hook-and-Loop Fastener

A hook-and-loop fastener (“NEW ECOMAGIC” (registered trademark)manufactured by KURARAY FASTENING CO., LTD) was attached to a frictionblock of a wear tester type II described in Japanese Industrial Standard(JIS) L 0849 with a hook side of the fastener facing a test stage. On atest piece stage, a laminated cloth was mounted with the back surfacelayer (skin side layer) of the laminated cloth facing the frictionblock. In this state, a load of 2 N was applied to the friction block,and the fabric was rubbed with the friction block 100 times in thelongitudinal direction or the transversal direction. Three sheets of thefabric were tested for each of the longitudinal direction and thetransversal direction. The state of the rubbed portions of the testpieces was evaluated on the following four-grade scale, and the averagevalue in each of the longitudinal direction and the transversaldirection was calculated, and rounded off to an integer. Here, thecalculations were made with the area of the rubbed portion being assumedto be 1995 mm² (105×19 mm).

<<Evaluation Criteria>>

Grade 1: The area where the fabric structure was disturbed was 15% ormore of the rubbed portion.

Grade 2: The area where the fabric structure was disturbed was less than15% of the rubbed portion.

Grade 3: The fabric structure was not disturbed, but fluff was observedslightly.

Grade 4: No change was observed.

(8) Texture

The texture was evaluated based on the following four-grade scale by 10males and females in total, who compared the touch of the back surfacebetween a conventional cloth and the laminated cloth. As theconventional cloth, a cloth of Comparative Example 4 was used, which wasa laminated cloth using a tricot lining, which is generally and oftenused.

<<Evaluation Criteria>>

A: Better than the conventional cloth

B: Slightly better than the conventional cloth

C: At the same level as the conventional cloth

x: Poorer than the conventional cloth

(9) Separability from the Skin

The separability from the skin was evaluated as follows. Specifically,0.3 cc of water was placed on the entire back surface of a sample of alaminated cloth of 10 cm in length×10 cm in width, and immediatelythereafter, the laminated cloth was evaluated by touching with the hand.Ten males and females in total compared the laminated cloth with aconventional cloth to evaluate the separability from the skin on thefollowing four-grade scale. As the conventional cloth, a cloth ofComparative Example 4 was used, which was a laminated cloth using atricot lining, which is generally and often used.

<<Evaluation Criteria>>

A: Better than the conventional cloth

B: Slightly better than the conventional cloth

C: At the same level as the conventional cloth

D: Poorer than the conventional cloth

(10) Overall Evaluation as Laminated Cloth

<<Evaluation Criteria>>

B: Excellent as a laminated cloth

D: Poor as a laminated cloth

Example 1

For a front surface layer, a fabric was prepared by performing awater-repellent treatment with a fluorine-containing water repellent ona woven fabric (mass per unit area: 40 g/m²) having a plain weavestructure in which warp threads and weft threads were both constitutedof untextured nylon yarn of 33 dtex and 26 filaments.

For a middle layer, a hydrophilic nonporous resin film (mass per unitarea: 13 g/m²) made of a polyurethane-based resin was prepared.

The hydrophilic nonporous resin film made of the polyurethane-basedresin was bonded to one surface of the woven fabric by a laminationmethod using a polyurethane-based adhesive agent. Thus, a laminatedcloth was obtained.

Further, a polyurethane-based adhesive agent was gravure printed on afilm surface of the laminated cloth with a gravure coater to achieve acoating ratio of 45%. Then, a circular knitted fabric having thestructure shown in FIG. 6 and being prepared for a back surface layerwas laminated on the film surface of the laminated cloth. Here, in thecircular knitted fabric, untextured nylon yarn of 17 dtex and 7filaments was used and the number of tuck stitches per area of 12wales×12 courses was 36. Thus, a laminated cloth of the presentinvention (mass per unit area: 90 g/m²) was obtained.

The circular knitted fabric used for the back surface layer was knittedby using a single circular knitting machine, and finished by an ordinarydyeing method with 42 wales/2.54 cm, 89 courses/2.54 cm, and the numberof knit stitches of 3,738/6.45 cm².

Tables 1 and 2 show evaluation results of the laminated cloth and thelike.

In Table 1, “dtex” represents decitex, a unit of fineness, “f”represents the number of filaments contained in a single strand of theyarn. Also in Table 1, “NY” represents a polyamide fiber (nylon fiber),and “PE” represents a polyester fiber. Also in Table 1, “untexturedyarn” represents unprocessed yarn, and “textured yarn” representsfalse-twist textured yarn.

Example 2

For a front surface layer, a fabric was prepared by performing awater-repellent treatment with a fluorine-containing water repellent ona woven fabric (mass per unit area: 40 g/m²) having a plain weavestructure in which warp threads and weft threads were both constitutedof untextured nylon yarn of 33 dtex and 26 filaments.

For a middle layer, a porous PTFE film (mass per unit area: 33 g/m²) wasprepared. As a hydrophilic resin to be applied onto the porous PTFEfilm, a polyurethane prepolymer application liquid was prepared byadding ethylene glycol to a hydrophilic polyurethane resin to achieve aNCO/OH equivalence ratio of 1/0.9, followed by mixing and stirring. Thepolyurethane prepolymer application liquid was applied onto one surfaceof the porous PTFE film with a roll coater (was impregnated into part ofa surface layer of the film). Subsequently, the film was placed in anoven adjusted to a temperature of 80° C. and a humidity of 80% RH for 1hour, and the polyurethane prepolymer was cured by reaction with water.Thus, a hydrophilic polyurethane resin layer was formed on the onesurface of the porous PTFE film.

A surface of the porous PTFE film on which the hydrophilic polyurethaneresin layer was not present was bonded to one surface of the wovenfabric by a lamination method using a polyurethane-based adhesive agent.Thus, a laminated cloth was obtained.

Further, a polyurethane-based adhesive agent was gravure printed on afilm surface of the laminated cloth with a gravure coater to achieve acoating ratio of 40%. Then, a circular knitted fabric having thestructure shown in FIG. 6 and being prepared for a back surface layerwas laminated on the film surface of the laminated cloth. Here, in thecircular knitted fabric, untextured nylon yarn of 9 dtex and 5 filamentswas used, and the number of tuck stitches per area of 12 wales×12courses was 36. Thus, a laminated cloth of the present invention (massper unit area: 106 g/m²) was obtained.

The circular knitted fabric used for the back surface layer was knittedby using a single circular knitting machine, and finished by an ordinarydyeing method with 82 wales/2.54 cm, 81 courses/2.54 cm, and the numberof the knit stitches of 6,642/6.45 cm².

Tables 1 and 2 show evaluation results of the laminated cloth and thelike.

Example 3

For a front surface layer, a fabric was prepared by performing awater-repellent treatment with a fluorine-containing water repellent ona woven fabric (mass per unit area: 40 g/m²) having a plain weavestructure in which warp threads and weft threads were both constitutedof untextured nylon yarn of 33 dtex and 26 filaments.

For a middle layer, a porous PTFE film (mass per unit area: 33 g/m²) wasprepared. As a hydrophilic resin to be applied onto the porous PTFEfilm, a polyurethane prepolymer application liquid was prepared byadding ethylene glycol to a hydrophilic polyurethane resin to achieve aNCO/OH equivalence ratio of 1/0.9, followed by mixing and stirring. Thepolyurethane prepolymer application liquid was applied onto one surfaceof the porous PTFE film with a roll coater (was impregnate into part ofa surface layer of the film). Subsequently, the film was placed in anoven adjusted to a temperature of 80° C. and a humidity of 80% RH for 1hour, and the polyurethane prepolymer was cured by reaction with water.Thus, a hydrophilic polyurethane resin layer was formed on the onesurface of the porous PTFE film.

A surface of the porous PTFE film on which the hydrophilic polyurethaneresin layer was not present was bonded to one surface of the wovenfabric by a lamination method using a polyurethane-based adhesive agent.Thus, a laminated cloth was obtained.

Further, a polyurethane-based adhesive agent was gravure printed on afilm surface of the laminated cloth with a gravure coater to achieve acoating ratio of 40%. Then, a circular knitted fabric having thestructure shown in FIG. 7 and being prepared for a back surface layerwas laminated on the film surface of the laminated cloth. Here, in thecircular knitted fabric, untextured nylon yarn of 17 dtex and 7filaments was used, and the number of tuck stitches per area of 12wales×12 courses was 48. Thus, a laminated cloth of the presentinvention (mass per unit area: 115 g/m²) was obtained.

The circular knitted fabric used for the back surface layer was knittedby using a single circular knitting machine, and finished by an ordinarydyeing method with 49 wales/2.54 cm, 87 courses/2.54 cm, and the numberof the knit stitches of 4,263/6.45 cm².

Tables 1 and 2 show evaluation results of the laminated cloth and thelike.

Example 4

For a front surface layer, a fabric was prepared by performing awater-repellent treatment with a fluorine-containing water repellent ona circular knitted fabric (mass per unit area: 56 g/m²) having a smoothstructure constituted of false-twist textured polyester yarn of 22 dtexand 24 filaments.

For a middle layer, a hydrophilic nonporous resin film (mass per unitarea: 13 g/m²) made of a polyurethane-based resin was prepared.

The hydrophilic nonporous resin film made of the polyurethane-basedresin was bonded to one surface of the woven fabric by a laminationmethod using a polyurethane-based adhesive agent. Thus, a laminatedcloth was obtained.

Further, a polyurethane-based adhesive agent was gravure printed on afilm surface of the laminated cloth with a gravure coater to achieve acoating ratio of 45%. Then, a circular knitted fabric having thestructure shown in FIG. 8 and being prepared for a back surface layerwas laminated on the film surface of the laminated cloth. In thecircular knitted fabric, untextured yarn polyester of 22 dtex and 12filaments was used, and the number of tuck stitches per area of 12wales×12 courses was 27. Thus, a laminated cloth of the presentinvention (mass per unit area: 117 g/m²) was obtained.

The circular knitted fabric used for the back surface layer was knittedby using a single circular knitting machine, and finished by an ordinarydyeing method with 59 wales/2.54 cm, 83 courses/2.54 cm, and the numberof the knit stitches of 4,897/6.45 cm².

Tables 1 and 2 show evaluation results of the laminated cloth and thelike.

Example 5

For a front surface layer, a fabric was prepared by performing awater-repellent treatment with a fluorine-containing water repellent ona woven fabric (mass per unit area: 40 g/m²) having a plain weavestructure in which warp threads and weft threads were both constitutedof untextured nylon yarn of 33 dtex and 26 filaments.

For a middle layer, a porous PTFE film (mass per unit area: 33 g/m²) wasprepared. As a hydrophilic resin to be applied onto the porous PTFEfilm, a polyurethane prepolymer application liquid was prepared byadding ethylene glycol to a hydrophilic polyurethane resin to achieve aNCO/OH equivalence ratio of 1/0.9, followed by mixing and stirring. Thepolyurethane prepolymer application liquid was applied onto one surfaceof the porous PTFE film with a roll coater (was impregnate into part ofa surface layer of the film). Subsequently, the film was placed in anoven adjusted to a temperature of 80° C. and a humidity of 80% RH for 1hour, and the polyurethane prepolymer was cured by reaction with water.Thus, a hydrophilic polyurethane resin layer was formed on the onesurface of the porous PTFE film.

A surface of the porous PTFE film on which the hydrophilic polyurethaneresin layer was not present was bonded to one surface of the wovenfabric by a lamination method using a polyurethane-based adhesive agent.Thus, a laminated cloth was obtained.

Further, a polyurethane-based adhesive agent was gravure printed on afilm surface of the laminated cloth with a gravure coater to achieve acoating ratio of 40%. Then, a circular knitted fabric having thestructure shown in FIG. 6 and being prepared for a back surface layerwas laminated on the film surface of the laminated cloth. Here, in thecircular knitted fabric, untextured nylon yarn of 22 dtex and 7filaments and untextured nylon yarn of 17 dtex and 7 filaments wereused, and the number of tuck stitches per area of 12 wales×12 courseswas 36. Thus, a laminated cloth of the present invention (mass per unitarea: 112 g/m²) was obtained.

The circular knitted fabric used for the back surface layer was knittedby using a single circular knitting machine in such a manner that theuntextured nylon yarn of 22 dtex and 7 filaments was used for thestructures of F1 and F3 in FIG. 6 and the untextured nylon yarn of 17dtex and 7 filaments was used for the structures of F2 and F4, and thenthe circular knitted fabric was finished by an ordinary dyeing methodwith 43 wales/2.54 cm, 96 courses/2.54 cm, and the number of the knitstitches 4,128/6.45 cm².

Tables 1 and 2 show evaluation results of the laminated cloth and thelike.

Example 6

For a front surface layer, a fabric was prepared by performing awater-repellent treatment with a fluorine-containing water repellent ona woven fabric (mass per unit area: 40 g/m²) having a plain weavestructure in which warp threads and weft threads were both constitutedof untextured nylon yarn of 33 dtex and 26 filaments.

For a middle layer, a hydrophilic nonporous resin film (mass per unitarea: 13 g/m²) made of a polyurethane-based resin was prepared.

The hydrophilic nonporous resin film made of the polyurethane-basedresin was bonded to one surface of the woven fabric by a laminationmethod using a polyurethane-based adhesive agent. Thus, a laminatedcloth was obtained.

Further, a polyurethane-based adhesive agent was gravure printed on afilm surface of the laminated cloth with a gravure coater to achieve acoating ratio of 45%. Then, a circular knitted fabric having thestructure shown in FIG. 6 and being prepared for a back surface layerwas laminated on the film surface of the laminated cloth. Here, in thecircular knitted fabric, untextured nylon yarn of 44 dtex and 34filaments was used, and the number of tuck stitches per area of 12wales×12 courses was 36. Thus, a laminated cloth of the presentinvention (mass per unit area: 111 g/m²) was obtained.

The circular knitted fabric used for the back surface layer was knittedby using a single circular knitting machine, and finished by an ordinarydyeing method with 40 wales/2.54 cm, 59 courses/2.54 cm, and the numberof the knit stitches of 2,360/6.45 cm².

Tables 1 and 2 show evaluation results of the laminated cloth and thelike.

Comparative Example 1

For a front surface layer, a fabric was prepared by performing awater-repellent treatment with a fluorine-containing water repellent ona woven fabric (mass per unit area: 40 g/m²) having a plain weavestructure in which warp threads and weft threads were both constitutedof untextured nylon yarn of 33 dtex and 26 filaments.

For a middle layer, a hydrophilic nonporous resin film (mass per unitarea: 13 g/m²) made of a polyurethane-based resin was prepared.

The hydrophilic nonporous resin film made of the polyurethane-basedresin was bonded to one surface of the woven fabric by a laminationmethod using a polyurethane-based adhesive agent. Thus, a laminatedcloth was obtained.

Further, a polyurethane-based adhesive agent was gravure printed on afilm surface of the laminated cloth with a gravure coater to achieve acoating ratio of 45%. Then, a circular knitted fabric having thestructure shown in FIG. 6 and prepared for a back surface layer waslaminated on the film surface of the laminated cloth. Here, in thecircular knitted fabric, false-twist textured polyester yarn of 22 dtexand 24 filaments was used, and the number of tuck stitches per area of12 wales×12 courses was 36. Thus, a laminated cloth (mass per unit area:89 g/m²) was obtained.

The circular knitted fabric used for the back surface layer was knittedby using a single circular knitting machine, and finished by an ordinarydyeing method with 34 wales/2.54 cm, 55 courses/2.54 cm, and the numberof the knit stitches of 1,870/6.45 cm².

Tables 1 and 2 show evaluation results of the laminated cloth and thelike.

Comparative Example 2

For a front surface layer, a fabric was prepared by performing awater-repellent treatment with a fluorine-containing water repellent ona woven fabric (mass per unit area: 40 g/m²) having a plain weavestructure in which warp threads and weft threads were both constitutedof untextured nylon yarn of 33 dtex and 26 filaments.

For a middle layer, a hydrophilic nonporous resin film (mass per unitarea: 13 g/m²) made of a polyurethane-based resin was prepared.

The hydrophilic nonporous resin film made of the polyurethane-basedresin was bonded to one surface of the woven fabric by a laminationmethod using a polyurethane-based adhesive agent. Thus, a laminatedcloth was obtained.

Further, a polyurethane-based adhesive agent was gravure printed on afilm surface of the laminated cloth with a gravure coater to achieve acoating ratio of 45%. Then, a circular knitted fabric having thestructure shown in FIG. 9 and being prepared for a back surface layerwas laminated on the film surface of the laminated cloth. Here, in thecircular knitted fabric, untextured nylon yarn of 17 dtex and 7filaments was used, and the number of tuck stitches per area of 12wales×12 courses was 7.2. Thus, a laminated cloth (mass per unit area:94 g/m²) was obtained.

The circular knitted fabric used for the back surface layer was knittedby using a single circular knitting machine, and finished by an ordinarydyeing method with 58 wales/2.54 cm, 96 courses/2.54 cm, and the numberof the knit stitches of 5,568/6.45 cm².

Tables 1 and 2 show evaluation results of the laminated cloth and thelike.

Comparative Example 3

For a front surface layer, a fabric was prepared by performing awater-repellent treatment with a fluorine-containing water repellent ona woven fabric (mass per unit area: 40 g/m²) having a plain weavestructure in which warp threads and weft threads were both constitutedof untextured nylon yarn of 33 dtex and 26 filaments.

For a middle layer, a hydrophilic nonporous resin film (mass per unitarea: 13 g/m²) made of a polyurethane-based resin was prepared.

The hydrophilic nonporous resin film made of the polyurethane-basedresin was bonded to one surface of the woven fabric by a laminationmethod using a polyurethane-based adhesive agent. Thus, a laminatedcloth was obtained.

Further, a polyurethane-based adhesive agent was gravure printed on afilm surface of the laminated cloth with a gravure coater to achieve acoating ratio of 45%. Then, a circular knitted fabric of plain stitchesprepared for a back surface layer was laminated on the film surface ofthe laminated cloth. Here, in the circular knitted fabric, untexturednylon yarn of 44 dtex and 34 filaments was used, and the number of tuckstitches per area of 12 wales×12 courses was 0. Thus, a laminated cloth(mass per unit area: 133 g/m²) was obtained.

The circular knitted fabric used for the back surface layer was knittedby using a single circular knitting machine, and finished by an ordinarydyeing method with 64 wales/2.54 cm, 80 courses/2.54 cm, and the numberof the knit stitches of 5,120/6.45 cm².

Tables 1 and 2 show evaluation results of the laminated cloth and thelike.

Comparative Example 4

For a front surface layer, a fabric was prepared by performing awater-repellent treatment with a fluorine-containing water repellent ona woven fabric (mass per unit area: 40 g/m²) having a plain weavestructure in which warp threads and weft threads were both constitutedof untextured nylon yarn of 33 dtex and 26 filaments.

For a middle layer, a hydrophilic nonporous resin film (mass per unitarea: 13 g/m²) made of a polyurethane-based resin was prepared.

The hydrophilic nonporous resin film made of the polyurethane-basedresin was bonded to one surface of the woven fabric by a laminationmethod using a polyurethane-based adhesive agent. Thus, a laminatedcloth was obtained.

Further, a polyurethane-based adhesive agent was gravure printed on afilm surface of the laminated cloth with a gravure coater to achieve acoating ratio of 45%. Then, a warp-knitted fabric having half tricotstitches and being prepared for a back surface layer was laminated onthe film surface of the laminated cloth. Here, untextured nylon yarn of22 dtex and 7 filaments was used in the warp-knitted fabric. Thus, alaminated cloth (mass per unit area: 104 g/m²) was obtained.

The circular knitted fabric used for the back surface layer was knittedby using a tricot knitting machine, and finished by an ordinary dyeingmethod with 31 wales/2.54 cm, 45 courses/2.54 cm, and the number of theknit stitches of 1,395/6.45 cm².

Tables 1 and 2 show evaluation results of the laminated cloth and thelike.

TABLE 1 Middle layer (Intermediate layer) Laminate Front fabric (Frontsurface layer) Degree of mass per Mass Mass per Air waterproof Watervapor unit area Original Type of per unit unit area permeabilityproperty permeability (g/m²) yarn used fabric area (g/m²) Type (g/m²)(cc/cm² · sec) (cm) (g/m² · h) Ex. 1 90 33dtex26f Woven 40 Hydrophilic13 0.0 ≥300 600 NY/untextured fabric polyurethane yarn resin film Ex. 2106 33dtex26f Woven 40 Porous PTFE 33 0.0 ≥300 600 NY/untextured fabricfilm yarn Ex. 3 115 33dtx26f Woven 40 Porous PTFE 33 0.0 ≥300 600NY/untextured fabric film yarn Ex. 4 117 22dtex24f Circular 56Hydrophilic 13 0.0 ≥300 600 PE/textured yarn knitted polyurethane fabricresin film Ex. 5 112 33dtex26f Woven 40 Porous PTFE 33 0.0 ≥300 600NY/untextured fabric film yarn Ex. 6 111 33dtex26f Woven 40 Hydrophilic13 0.0 ≥300 600 NY/untextured fabric Polyurethane yarn resin film Comp.Ex. 1 89 33dtex26f Woven 40 Hydrophilic 13 0.0 ≥300 600 NY/untexturedfabric polyurethane yarn resin film Comp. Ex. 2 94 33dtex26f Woven 40Hydrophilic 13 0.0 ≥300 600 NY/untextured fabric polyurethane yarn resinfilm Comp. Ex. 3 133 33dtex26f Woven 40 Hydrophilic 13 0.0 ≥300 600NY/untextured fabric polyurethane yarn resin film Comp. Ex. 4 10433dtex26f Woven 40 Hydrophilic 13 0.0 ≥300 600 NY/untextured fabricpolyurethane yarn resin film

TABLE 2 Back fabric (Back surface layer) Number of Number of tuck Massper knit stitches per unit stitches Durability (grade) SeparabilityOriginal yarn area of 12 area (stitches/ Cover Longitudinal Transversalfrom Overall used wales × 12courses (g/m²) 6.45 cm²) factor Texturedirection direction skin evaluation Ex. 1 17dtex7f 36.0 16 3,738 540 B 43 B B NY/untextured yarn Ex. 2 9dtex5f 36.0 13 6,642 489 A 3 3 B BNY/untextured yarn Ex. 3 17dtx7f 48.0 22 4,263 560 B 3 2 A BNY/untextured yarn Ex. 4 22dtex12f 27.0 27 4,897 666 B 3 3 B BPE/untextured yarn Ex. 5 22dtex7f 36.0 19 4,128 614 B 4 3 B BNY/untextured yarn 17dtex7f NY/untextured yarn Ex. 6 44dtex34f 36.0 342,360 657 B 4 3 B B NY/untextured yarn Comp. Ex. 1 22dtex24f 36.0 151,870 417 B 2 1 B D PE/textured yarn Comp. Ex. 2 17dtex7f 7.2 20 5,568746 A 3 3 D D NY/untextured yarn Comp. Ex. 3 44dtex34f 0.0 59 5,120 955A 4 4 D D NY/untextured yarn Comp. Ex. 4 22dtex7f — 30 1,395 — C 1 1 C DNY/untextured yarn

INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

In applications for garments which are required to have windbreakingability, water resistance/water vapor permeability, or the like, thepresent invention makes it possible to obtain a laminated cloth in whicha back surface has good texture, separability from the skin, andphysical properties associated with resistance to tangling and abrasion.The laminated cloth can be used in applications for various garments.

EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE NUMERALS

-   A tuck stitch-   B to D knit stitches-   a to d and f to h stitches-   e strand in a portion where a knit stitch was formed-   F1 to F4 yarn feed numbers of knitting machine-   C1 to C12 cylinder needle row-   i, j, k, l constituent strands of yarn-   1 front surface layer of laminated cloth-   2 middle layer of laminated cloth-   3 back surface layer of laminated cloth

The invention claimed is:
 1. A laminated cloth comprising: a frontsurface layer, a middle layer, and a back surface layer, wherein thefront surface layer, the middle layer and the back surface layer arestacked on each other, wherein the front surface layer comprises one ormore of a woven fabric, a knitted fabric, or a non-woven fabric, whereinthe middle layer comprises a resin film, wherein the resin film has awater vapor permeability of 50 g/m²·h or more as measured by the methodB-2 of JIS L 1099, wherein the back surface layer comprises a circularknitted fabric having knit stitches and tuck stitches, wherein thecircular knitted fabric has a mass per unit area in the range of 8 to 35g/m², wherein the number of knit stitches of the circular knitted fabricis in the range of 3500 to 10000 per 6.45 cm², wherein the circularknitted fabric comprises a filament yarn of 60 dtex or less, and whereinthe number of the tuck stitches of the circular knitted fabric is in therange of 9 to 54 per area of 12 wales×12 courses.
 2. The laminated clothaccording to claim 1, wherein the circular knitted fabric is a singlecircular knitted fabric.
 3. The laminated cloth according to claim 1,wherein the filament yarn has a fineness of 36 dtex or less.
 4. Thelaminated cloth according to claim 1, wherein two or more types offilament yarn are used as the filament yarn.
 5. The laminated clothaccording to claim 1, wherein two or more types of filament yarn havingdifferent finenesses are used as the filament yarn.
 6. The laminatedcloth according to claim 1, wherein the middle layer is obtained byusing a resin film having an air permeability of 50 cc/cm²·sec or less,the air permeability being measured by the method A (Frazier-type) ofJapanese Industrial Standard (JIS) L
 1096. 7. The laminated clothaccording to claim 1, wherein the middle layer is obtained by using aresin film having a degree of waterproof property (water resistance) of100 cm or more and a water vapor permeability of 50 g/m²·h or more, thedegree of waterproof property being measured by the method A of JapaneseIndustrial Standard (JIS) L 1092, the water vapor permeability beingmeasured by the method B-2 of JIS L
 1099. 8. The laminated clothaccording to claim 1, wherein the circular knitted fabric has a coverfactor (CF) of 200 to 800.